<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Center for Education Reform&#187; Virginia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edreform.com/tag/va/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edreform.com</link>
	<description>Since 1993, the leading voice and advocate for lasting, substantive and structural education reform in the U.S.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia: Moving Forward or Backward in Education?</title>
		<link>http://www.edreform.com/2012/03/virginia-moving-forward-or-backward-in-education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edreform.com/2012/03/virginia-moving-forward-or-backward-in-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edreform.com/?p=6849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entering 2012, the state of Virginia was coping with the effects of a faulty funding formula, which did not provide equity for all students statewide, that the existence of full-time virtual schools had exposed. Senate Bill 598 was introduced in January to fix the problem by insuring fair funding for public school students who wanted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entering 2012, the state of Virginia was coping with the effects of a faulty funding formula, which did not provide equity for all students statewide, that the existence of full-time virtual schools had exposed.</p>
<p>Senate Bill 598 was introduced in January to fix the problem by insuring fair funding for public school students who wanted access to full-time, statewide virtual schools that had been approved by during a rigorous review process by the Virginia Department of Education. The fixes—themselves worked through in a lengthy and rigorous process—insured fair funding not only for the students, but also in a way that could work for the districts.</p>
<p>In the last week of February, however, changes were introduced to the bill that struck out all of the well-balanced language in the bill designed to fix the faulty funding formula. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelhorn/2012/03/05/virginia-moving-forward-or-backward-in-education/"target="_blank">Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edreform.com/2012/03/virginia-moving-forward-or-backward-in-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Restrict Digital Learning?</title>
		<link>http://www.edreform.com/2012/03/why-restrict-digital-learning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edreform.com/2012/03/why-restrict-digital-learning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edreform.com/?p=6655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warning to Virginia lawmakers that SB598 would limit access to high-quality education. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Finn: All students could access high-quality education&#8221;<br />
by Deirdre Finn<br />
Op-Ed<br />
<em><a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/oped/2012/mar/06/tdopin02-finn-all-students-could-access-high-quali-ar-1742384/"target="_blank">Richmond Times-Dispatch</a></em><br />
March 6, 2012</p>
<p>Virginia lawmakers are being asked today to consider legislation (SB 598) that severely restricts students&#8217; access to a high-quality education. This legislation prohibits students from enrolling in an approved virtual school that is offered by a school division other than their own.</p>
<p>In this day and age, the Internet makes geography irrelevant to getting a great education. Virtual learning tears down the greatest barrier to high-quality education — access to a rigorous curriculum taught by effective educators. With virtual learning, all students — particularly those in rural regions or urban centers — can access the same high quality education typically enjoyed by students in affluent suburban neighborhoods. Students who live anywhere can learn anywhere. For many students, the option to attend a virtual school is a lifeline to an education that prepares them for success in college and challenging 21st-century careers.</p>
<p>Technology has changed the way we live, work and play. It has increased productivity in the workplace and enhanced communication with family and friends. And it has the power to transform education.</p>
<p>Imagine if the law applied the same restrictions to other areas of life. Limiting online shopping to stores in your neighborhood would likely cause outrage. Restricting access to Web-based learning should cause the same reaction.</p>
<p>Last year, I was part of a team of independent researchers that reviewed and analyzed education policies in every state in the nation for Digital Learning Now!, a national initiative launched by former Govs. Jeb Bush (R-Fla.) and Bob Wise (D-W.Va.) to harness the power of technology to provide an education that prepares each and every student for success in college and challenging 21st-century careers. Virginia scored well in that analysis, but this legislation runs the risk of reversing all the progress Virginia has made.</p>
<p>Digital learning, whether offered online or in the classroom, has the potential to customize education so every student learns — no student gets bored and no student gets left behind.</p>
<p>The greatest obstacles to students accessing virtual education are not funding, availability of high-quality options, technology or Internet connectivity. The greatest obstacles are policies that allow school divisions to deny virtual education to students and the use of geography to determine eligibility — both of which are relics of an education system that was established well before the World Wide Web. SB 598 in its current form exacerbates both of these problems.</p>
<p>Allowing students to choose a virtual school outside of their school division would offer multiple benefits.</p>
<p>First, students would only be allowed to choose from a school that has been approved by a school division in the state of Virginia. All virtual school options would be approved by a school division.</p>
<p>Second, multiple options would allow students to choose the school that ensures their greatest chance of academic success. Providing students with the best opportunity to earn a high school diploma, even if it is not the choice of the school division, is in the best interests of the students whose future depends on their education and the taxpayers who pay for the results.</p>
<p>Third, not all school divisions would have to contract with all providers, which would reduce the burden on school divisions while maximizing choices for students. Given the tremendous pressure on education budgets, this option could provide a welcome relief to school divisions.</p>
<p>The original legislation provided a common-sense solution to the challenge of paying for virtual school, given the varied funding levels provided by school divisions throughout Virginia. The proposed legislation established an equitable formula to pay for the education of students who attend virtual school and left the choice to the families, not the school divisions.</p>
<p>But the original legislation, which would have empowered students and parents, has been severely amended. It is now nearly 180 degrees from where it started.</p>
<p>Virginia lawmakers have the opportunity to tap into the incredible potential of technology to transform education and unleash the academic potential of students across the state. Our hope is, lawmakers will embrace the power of online learning and ensure all students have access to a quality education.</p>
<p><em>Deirdre Finn is deputy director of the Foundation for Excellence in Education and director of Digital Learning Now! Get more information at info@excelined.org or (850) 491-4090.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edreform.com/2012/03/why-restrict-digital-learning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hits just keep on coming</title>
		<link>http://www.edreform.com/edspresso-shots/the-hits-just-keep-on-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edreform.com/edspresso-shots/the-hits-just-keep-on-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charter school law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple authorizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Henry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edspresso.com/?p=4038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opening of Virginia&#8217;s latest charter school (one of only four operating around the state) has been nothing but a roller coaster ride, not to mention a textbook example of the more-often-than-not contentious relationship between school districts and their charter schools when districts hold all the cards under a weak charter law: Since the start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0px 2px;" title="tophits" src="http://www.edreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/tophits.jpg" alt="dontchange" width="250" height="250" align="right" />The opening of Virginia&#8217;s latest charter school (one of only four operating around the state) has been nothing but a roller coaster ride, not to mention a textbook example of the more-often-than-not contentious relationship between school districts and their charter schools when districts hold all the cards under a weak charter law:</p>
<p>Since the start of their dance with Richmond Public Schools (RPS) in the spring of 2008:</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/local/article/CHAR06GAT_20081006-071608/107369/" target="_blank">Patrick Henry was forced to go through the RPS approval vote process three times</a></p>
<p>- <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/local/article/CHAR06GAT_20081006-071608/107369/" target="_blank">Patrick Henry was initially left out of this year&#8217;s RPS budget</a></p>
<p>- <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/opinion/editorials/article/ED-PHEN05_20100204-181404/322242/" target="_blank">Patrick Henry is to be held to higher standards than other RPS schools, but will receive 21 percent less funding</a></p>
<p>- <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/local/article/PHEN02_20100501-222809/341595/" target="_blank">Patrick Henry was &#8220;generously&#8221; granted leased space from RPS at a cost of $1 per year &#8211; facilities which came with a crippling renovation price tag of close to $1 million</a></p>
<p>Enough already?</p>
<p>Apparently not. Yesterday, <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/opinion/op_ed/article/-RTD_2008_05_18_0098/21356/" target="_blank">a school more than 2 years in the making</a>, one that will offer families a longer school year and a curriculum focus not available in traditional Richmond schools, was faced with the possibility of being on the receiving end of one more hit &#8211; the potential refusal by RPS to hire their first principal just as the final preparations for their inaugural school year get under way.<span id="more-4038"></span></p>
<p>And why? An effort by the district to force facilities compliance Patrick Henry administrators have been making every effort to raise the money for, a compliance the Richmond School District never themselves deemed important until slapped with a lawsuit they now want to share with a school who&#8217;s doors have yet to open.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, this didn&#8217;t happen. But it could have.</p>
<p>Virginia needs to do more than create a new layer of bureaucratic oversight of the charter school approval process. Legislators need to realize that as long as they allow local school boards  to remain the sole &#8220;deciders&#8221; on the future of charters in the Commonwealth, only one decision will likely prevail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edreform.com/edspresso-shots/the-hits-just-keep-on-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>