Home » Edspresso (Page 60)

Morning Shots

Charters: Positive Alternative (Fred Crawford)

In today’s world, education is the key to one’s future. The outlook could be bleak according to the researchers of Educational Testing Services (ETS). A report from ETS’s Policy Information Center states that, unless we act now, the “convergence of three powerful socioeconomic forces are changing our nation’s future: substantial disparities in skill levels (reading and math); seismic economic changes (widening wage gaps); and sweeping demographic shifts (less education, lower skills).”

Fortunately, South Carolina students today do have some control over their futures. Students can take action on two of these three forces by choosing a school that meets their learning needs, increases their skill level, and offers academic guidance. Deciding on which school to attend may also affect career choices and narrow the wage gap, as well. The South Carolina public education system offers two types of public school choices: traditional and charter.

Traditional and charter public schools are funded by local, state, and federal moneys, except that public charter schools do not receive funding for facilities, transportation and often food services. Neither traditional nor charter public schools can charge tuition or may “pick and choose” their students. Traditional public schools are controlled by a central local governmental authority such as a district school board.

Most traditional public schools operate within a defined attendance area, and may require an application if students enroll outside the defined perimeter. Some traditional school systems also offer opportunities in magnet and alternative schools that exist outside zoned school boundaries. They usually have a special program to offer which makes them an option for some students. Magnet schools are not autonomous, remain part of the bureaucracy of the traditional school system and usually are highly selective of students. All traditional schools are required to comply with district and state regulations. For example, the state mandates

Read More …

Comments(0)

Sticker Shock

In yesterday’s Washington Post, Andrew Coulson laid out full school choice as an educationally and fiscally compelling option for DC’s public school students who are currently being undereducated – to the tune of $24,600/pupil – by a district "bureaucracy so Byzantine it would give Rube Goldberg an aneurysm." He looks at the ledger more closely on the Cato blog, noting that, ultimately, "the real cost of this dysfunctional system is not measured in dollars and cents but in the hopes and futures it has destroyed."

Comments(0)

Living in a Post-National Math Panel World (Barry Garelick)

The British mathematician J. E. Littlewood once began a math class for freshmen with the following statement: "I’ve been giving this lecture to first-year classes for over twenty-five years. You’d think they would begin to understand it by now."

People involved in the debate about how math is best taught in grades K-12, must feel a bit like Littlewood in front of yet another first year class. Every year as objectionable math programs are introduced into schools, parents are alarmed at what isn’t being taught. The new "first-year class" of parents is then indoctrinated into what has come to be known as the math wars as the veterans – mathematicians, frustrated teachers, experienced parents, and pundits – start the laborious process of explanation once more.

It was therefore a watershed event when the President’s National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMP) held its final meeting on March 13, 2008 and voted unanimously to approve its report: Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel.

Unlike Littlewood addressing his perpetual first-year students, the report assumes that the class has actually begun to understand it by now and moves on. It does so quickly and efficiently: "he system that translates mathematical knowledge into value and ability for the next generation – is broken and must be fixed. This is not a conclusion about teachers or school administrators, or textbooks or universities or any other single element of the system. It is about how the many parts do not now work together to achieve a result worthy of this country’s values and ambitions."

The report provides benchmarks for the critical foundations of algebra, setting out grade level expectations of mastery for fluency with whole numbers, fluency with fractions, and geometry and measurement. It also provides recommendations for the major topics of an

Read More …

Comments(3)

Edspresso Lounge

Edspresso Archive

Education Blogs