{Scene opens to a packed chamber of the British Parliament for Eduwonk Question Time. A number of studies anxiously await the chance to pose a question to the Eduwonk.}

Mr. Speaker: “Questions to the Eduwonk- Chapter 10 of Rethinking Special Education-Nasty Brutish…and Often Not Very Short: The Attorney Perspective on Due Process”
Nasty, Brutish, etc: “Number 1 Mr. Speaker!”
{Eduwonk rises from the bench, places a book on the dispatch box, and answers}
Eduwonk: “This morning I presided over a meeting of the Education Sector Staff and blogged like mad. In addition to my duties in this House, I shall be having further meetings later today.”
Speaker: “Chapter 10!”
Chapter 10: “Thank you Mr. Speaker. Does the Eduwonk recall editing me? Isn’t it odd for him to claim that the process of some special needs children attending private schools through the legalistic process is adequate when we described the process that can lead to such placements as “blunt, costly, time-consuming, and otherwise imperfect instrument to accomplish its assigned task” in 2001? Does he recall the part where we concluded “The current due process regime is very complex and technical, and thus difficult (if not nearly impossible) for parents to navigate successfully without legal representation or well-trained parent advocates?”
Eduwonk: “It is the position of this blog not to support school vouchers for disabled children unless they can sue their way out of the system. School officials know best about these sort of things, and if they do not, you can attend a school of choice after proving malpractice with a fancy attorney. Can’t afford one of those, well, tough!”
{Backbenchers grumble, the opposition sits with jaws agape in stunned silence}
Speaker: “Chapter 13 of Rethinking Special Education!”

