Home » Edspresso (Page 131)

Morning Shots

Arrested Acceleration (Jennifer Buckingham)

The story of academically gifted Gracia Malaxetxebarria, who lives in the state of Queensland in Australia, is not an uncommon one–except that her mother went to uncommon lengths to see justice done. 

Gracia, with an IQ of 147 (the average is 100) wanted to move into a higher grade, where the work was more compatible with her intelligence level. When Gracia’s mother put this to her daughter’s public school, it denied the request, apparently for the reason that Gracia “needed more time to develop socially.”

So Gracia’s mother took her to a private school, where she went into Year 8 at the age of 9, three years ahead of her age peers. Despite the fact that she achieved high marks and received good reports from the private school, the public school system still refused to allow her to transfer back to a public school at the same grade level.

Gracia’s mother took the matter to court and won Gracia the right to grade acceleration in the public school system.

This is an important victory. In some public school systems in Australia there is still strong resistance to the idea that gifted children have special educational needs. When faced with this resistance many families withdraw from the system rather than fight it. For this reason, stories about high achieving children often involve home schooling families. For example, home schooled twins Edward and Katherine Alpert, also from Queensland, made the news this year for completing bachelor degrees at the age of 15.

University of New South Wales academic Miraca Gross is co-author of a 2004 report called A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students, with University of Iowa researchers Nicholas Colangelo and Susan G. Assouline.

The report finds that acceleration — skipping grades — is positive for students in the short-term

Read More …


The Dismal Record on Parental Choice in NCLB (Dan Lips)

When he signed his signature education initiative into law, President George W. Bush stated that “Parents must be given real options in the face of failure in order to make sure reform is meaningful.” But four years later, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has provided few American families with real options. 

Under No Child Left Behind, students in low-performing schools are supposed to be able to seek out alternative educational opportunities. Specifically, public schools that fail to make adequate yearly progress over time must offer students the option to transfer to a better public school or choose an after-school tutoring program.  

But few students have benefited from these provisions. According to the Department of Education, less than one percent of the nearly four million eligible students transferred public schools in the 2003–04 school year. About 233,000 students, or 17 percent of those eligible, participated in the after-school tutoring program that year. 

For the students who were able to take advantage of choice under NCLB, these new options may have been a lifeline from an otherwise hopeless situation. But clearly these provisions have made far less of an impact than the law’s creators envisioned.  

For that shortcoming, blame the public education bureaucracy’s poor implementation and lack of cooperation. The Department of Education found that half of all public school districts notified parents of the transfer option after the school year had already begun, too late for most students to benefit from changing schools. And less than half of eligible families were aware of the after-school tutoring program, according to a Department of Education focus group. Tutoring providers report that school districts are often uncooperative, which leads to reduced student participation.  

Dr. Barbara Anderson of Knowledge Learning Corporation, a tutoring provider, highlighted the lack of awareness at a House Education and Workforce Committee hearing last

Read More …


Stop a Silly Argument: Learn from Success (Joe Nathan)

It’s time to learn from success and stop a silly argument. Thatís my reaction to attending a recent meeting in Nashville, where researchers compared charter and district public schools.

Professors tried to answer the question: which are better: charter or district public schools? As has happened in dozens of other studies, the results, as one researcher explained, ìare mixed.î

So how’s this for a stunning simple statement: There are some excellent, adequate and mediocre charter public schools. The same is true of district run public schools.

Instead of spending thousands, even millions of dollars trying to figure out whether district or charters are better, why not identify the most effective ones, and learn from them?

Former U.S. Congressman, and former Minnesota Governor Al Quie had a wonderful idea in the early 1970s. He applied the Agricultural Extension model to education. In agriculture, extension agents have been used to share research-based strategies with farmers. This allowed the spread of what educators now call “best practices” and helped American farmers be among the most productive in the world.

Quie helped write legislation that did the same general thing in education. Congress created a group to evaluate different approaches to teaching reading, math, and other subjects. Those approaches were then shared with educators in various states, along with funding to help educators learn from, adapt and adopt what had worked well elsewhere.

The “National Diffusion Network” worked well for many years (Full disclosure requires me to note that I worked at a Minnesota k-12 public school selected as a “carefully evaluated, proven innovation.” We helped educators adopt ideas we used, such as holding August individual family/student/teacher conferences, developing an advisor/advisee system so each student would be known well, and creating internships for high school students. Many researchers recommend these strategies now, more than 30 years we began

Read More …


Edspresso Lounge

Edspresso Archive

Education Blogs