Home » Edspresso (Page 101)

Morning Shots

Urban Tragedy (Mike Petrilli)

During the past few years, scores of impoverished inner-city schools have shut their doors. On the surface, that could be a blessing. After all, one of the major problems with American education is that bad schools seem to live forever.

But, alas, I’m not writing about those schools–the persistently failing public schools that, under No Child Left Behind, are supposed to be ”restructured” out of existence, or at least subjected to an extreme makeover. No, the ones leaving children standing outside their locked doors are generally places of deep learning, community institutions that have effectively served the children of the poor for generations. They are Catholic parochial schools–and their closure is nothing but a tragedy.

The trend is unmistakable. The Archdiocese of Detroit closed 21 schools last year (and more are likely to shut next year). The New York and Brooklyn archdioceses shut down 36 schools over the past two years. In 2005, the Chicago archdiocese ended operations in 18 schools. And the tally in Boston? Twenty-one schools over four years. The longer-term trends are even bleaker: Several big cities, such as Chicago, serve less than a third of the students today than they did 40 years ago.

The closures have little to do with the quality of education that these schools provide. Two decades of studies have shown them to be effective, especially for poor and minority children. Rather, broader demographic trends are to blame. Simply put, the schools’ pipeline of affordable teachers has run dry. Once upon a time, most Catholic-school instructors were members of religious orders, requiring little or no cash compensation; now there are more nuns over age 90 than under 50 in the U.S., and only five percent of the schools’ teachers come from religious orders. Lay teachers must be paid a decent wage, pushing Catholic-school

Read More …

Comments(0)

Restoring Federalism in Education: The Charter State Option (Dan Lips)

More than four decades before No Child Left Behind, Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona warned about the slippery slope of federal involvement in education: “Federal aid to education invariably means more federal control of education.” Goldwater went on to lose the 1964 presidential election to Lyndon Johnson. And in 1965, Johnson signed into law the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the foundation of today’s federal education policy. 

As Goldwater predicted, over time federal education funding has led to greater federal control of education. Federal influence reached new heights in 2002 with No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the eighth reauthorization of Johnson’s Elementary and Secondary Education Act. In addition to increasing federal funding for K-12 education, NCLB created new federal requirements for student testing, teacher quality, and many other things. 

This increase in federal power has caused lawmakers in Arizona and other states to ponder a question that probably would have occurred to the late Senator Goldwater: Can a state benefit by foregoing federal funding and opting-out of No Child Left Behind? In 2004, Arizona lawmakers proposed legislation to do just that. According to the National Council of State Legislatures, 21 states considered legislation critical of NCLB as of 2005. Seven states passed resolutions criticizing NCLB. 

The Phoenix-based Goldwater Institute recently published a new report examining Arizona’s relationship in education with the federal government. Written by Krista Kafer (a former senior education policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation), the report examines how NCLB has affected Arizona’s pre-existing standards and testing system. Kafer also considers Arizona lawmakers’ dilemma over whether to opt out of NCLB.

As Kafer explains, Arizona already had a comprehensive student testing strategy before NCLB. Arizona schools administered both a criterion-referenced test (AIMS) to measure student performance against state-established academic standards and a nationally norm-referenced test (SAT-9) to measure

Read More …

Comments(0)

Big Value from Small Schools (Joe Nathan)

Last month, in the huge city of Chicago, educators gathered to discuss the values and value of small public schools, like those found in many rural Minnesota communities. People from all over the U.S., and a few from Great Britain, generally agreed that smaller schools work better for many youngsters.

Convened by the Chicago-based Spencer Foundation, educators and philosophers considered the connection between values and evidence in education. As Michael McPherson, Spencer Foundation president pointed out, “we need much more discussion of the connections between these two.” I agree.

Millions of dollars from the U.S. Department of Education and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have and are being given out to help growing numbers of urban and suburban students attend small schools, or small schools within schools. Why?

Studies in Georgia, Ohio, Montana and Texas found that attending smaller schools helped reduce the impact of poverty. A federally funded review of research by Professor Mary Anne Raywid found several years ago, the value of small schools in increasing achievement, graduation rates, student, parent and family satisfaction and improving student behavior has been “confirmed with a clarity and a level of confidence rare in the annals of education research.”

Offering a vast array of courses does not mean that most students are well prepared for college. And small schools are not necessarily more expensive than large schools, especially when graduation rates are included. That’s because when similar students – rural, urban or suburban are compared, graduation rates are higher in smaller high schools. Professor Anthony Bryk of the University of Chicago has found a “dis-economy of scale” in many large schools. And Cincinnati’s KnowledgeWorks Foundation in Cincinnati concluded that rural consolidations can end up costing more money than they save.

Over the last several years, Congress has allocated millions of dollars to help

Read More …

Comments(0)

Edspresso Lounge

Edspresso Archive

Education Blogs