Home » Edreform University » Reports & Studies » State Campaign Plans

State Campaign Plans

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

A

September 15, 2003.  An assessment of how Arizona’s charter movement can grow and become a more effective force in the state.

B

The following provides a brief update on the first round o f contacts o f potential applicants made in Baltimore, Maryland. Part of CER’s Building Better Schools campaign.

Updates on a draft plan where goal is successul applications for charter from Baltimore City Public School System (BCPSS)

October 27, 2003.  Despite its long-standing, strong reputation for quality schools, Maryland is in need of more and better educational opportunities for children. Maryland’s charter school law is one of the nation’s weakest, and this is a campaign to change that.

C

Please Check Back Soon!

February 11, 2005. Notes on various charter school related items, including an effort to create a statewide charter school association, the landscape of charter school facilities, charter school achievement, and improving charter school law.

F

July 17, 2003. Important information on DC School Reform Proposals

July 18, 2007. A memo regarding a conference call with Larry Maloney & Teisha Johnson from Sonnenschein law firm during which the progress of the FEC in Connecticut and Missouri was discussed.

The Center for Education Reform asked Aspire Consulting to evaluate the revenue provided to Missouri districts and companion charter schools for FY 2006 and FY 2007 with the objective of determining if charter schools are receiving their fair portion of revenue under the state’s new funding formula.

This campaign is an effort to organize and file lawsuits in Connecticut, Georgia and Missouri that challenge how these states fund charter schools so as to ensure these schools receive every dollar they are entitled to.

M

April 22, 2003.  Memo about mobilizing grassroots advocates to put pressure on the Governor to veto the charter bill.

N

E3 seeks to undertake a statewide advocacy program that develops and sustains a real grassroots presence in New Jersey for charter schools. In addition, E3 and CER together will launch a major communications project aimed at improving understanding and support for charter schools.

P

R

Calls on DC parents to support the Cleveland Scholarship Case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

T

August 6, 2002. To advance the charter and choice movement (in some cases) into solid, well-organized, politically sound territory, the following steps have been taken to create a state action plan for target states.

W

An overview of the effort to create an independent charter school authorizes in Wyoming.

April 2, 2009. The Center for Education Reform has long looked at Wyoming as a state to watch and help cultivate its charter school movement.