Charter Schools in California
POLITICS:
- TERM LIMITS: The Los Angeles School Board has voted to
allow the high-achieving Granada Hills High School to convert to a charter
school. Charter status will free the school from some of the district bureaucracy,
but the one-year term presents its own problems. Read more
in CER Newswire May
20, 2003. As CER President Jeanne Allen told USA
Today, ''Our education crisis is not limited to the
urban areas.... The parents of the children in these Los
Angeles-area schools, even though they have more advantages
than others, are enormously frustrated that they can't get a
higher-quality education for their kids.'' Read
more coverage in the Los
Angeles Times.
- NEGATIVE
CHARTER REPORT SERIOUSLY FLAWED: A new
charter report released by Policy Analysis for
California Education (PACE) offers a distorted view of charter schools that focuses on
inputs and completely ignores the documented charter achievement
gains that render those inputs meaningless. Click
here for more
CER analysis. The Charter
School Leadership Council also rebukes PACE
'analysis' as biased, politically motivated.
- WORK IN PROGRESS: A recently introduced bill by Assemblywoman Patricia C. Bates and supported by
the state's charter schools and its association, CANEC, will expand the number
of charter authorizers beyond the local school boards. New authorizers allowed
under the new legislation would include state colleges and universities, mayors
of large cities and non-profit organizations. If passed, the legislation will
also counteract a law passed last year that imposed additional oversight and
restrictions on the Golden State charters. Get more details in CER
Newswire March 18, 2003.
- SLIP-SLIDING: California gets a "B"
because its law provides for a strong appeals process and the potential for
equitable funding. However, it fell four places in this year’s ranking because
it enacted legislation that allows for more regulation, including a new
three-tiered oversight provision which enables the district, the county or the
state to request information from charter schools at a moment’s notice. Charter
School Laws Across the States: Ranking Scorecard and Legislative
Profiles, January 2003.
- OVERSIGHT: Recently the Bureau of State Audits was asked to examine
how well the state's charter school oversight system is working. What it found
was that a few of the largest authorizers -- like Los Angeles and Oakland
Unified -- are not living up to their responsibilities. The auditors also found
that the California Department of Education (CDE) isn't helping. More details in
CER Newswire,
November 19, 2002.
- LAW-LESS: California’s law is being
eroded by false friends who want to curb problems but in so doing, have created
processes that add layers of bureaucracy to the chartering process. The
legislature has approved a bill that seriously impedes charter school autonomy
and sets up more rules and hoops for would-be charters to jump through. The
bill, AB 1994, restricts and removes by 2005 any charters that operate outside
of the district in which they were approved, sets up a false sense of new
chartering to county boards and the state board that can hear applications on
appeal but only under convoluted circumstances, and basically continues to
whittle away at charters as if they are some misdirected concept. From CER
Monthly Letter Back to School 2002.
- SHORT ON LOGIC: Indio Charter School has been thwarted in its fourth year
of business from receiving the funding to which it is entitled. The excuse being
used by state bureaucrats is that Indio only holds classes Monday through
Thursday, not five days a week. They say twenty percent fewer days equates to a
twenty percent reduction in funding. What they ignore is that the schools’
days are greatly extended, and that all told students are in school 20 percent longer
than state law requires. They also ignore that last year the charter produced
the highest Academic Performance Index scores of all 13 schools in the Indio
district, as well as the highest SAT-9 reading scores. From CER
Monthly Letter Back to School 2002.
- BAIT AND SWITCH: The Sequoia School District, in the heart of
Silicon Valley, is trying to avoid paying facilities money due the
Aurora Charter High School in San Carlos via an $88 million district
bond measure under the recently passed Prop. 39. The district filed a
lawsuit two weeks ago to prevent the school from receiving its
facilities aid. Sequoia claims they shouldn't have to provide facilities
funding for the school since a neighboring district granted the charter.
Redwood City District did so after Sequoia, mindful of its unique tax
status (school funding based on tax assessments rather than state
formula), persuaded the school's founders to withdraw their application
for the high school and submit it in the Redwood City district.
From CER Newswire July 10, 2002.
UPDATE: SUCCESS: San Mateo Superior Court Judge Quentin Kopp put an end to Sequoia's
shenanigans, ordering the district to comply with its obligation to provide
classrooms for the charter school. From CER
Newswire September 3, 2002.
DEVELOPMENTS:
- CHARTERS TO THE RESCUE: According to a new
report by WestEd, the Los Angeles Unified School District is a
decrepit mess almost totally impervious to reform, paralyzed by
bureaucratic and political gridlock. In Creating Excellence for all
Students: Transforming Education in Los Angeles, the authors write that:
“The governance system is characterized by a set of structures and a
culture that are highly resistant to change, leadership constraints that
impede the progress of the superintendent, a school board operating in a
politically charged environment, limited school autonomy, and unclear
accountability at all levels. It is no wonder that the results of past
education reforms have been limited.” Fortunately, the authors think
they have found a way to save L.A.: Charter schools, and lots of them.
Read the entire report, and the reasons behind the clarion call for
charter schools in the City of Angels, at WestEd’s
site.
- FEDERAL FUNDING: The feds announced the delivery of new federal
funds under the public charter school grant program. The program
provides up to $198 million for individual charter schools, research
grants and best practices dissemination. Charters in California will be
pleased to know that their state received $24 million. Several of them
have had to fight for their start up funds from the state each year, but
given the amount, Golden State education officials shouldn't have any
excuse this year. From CER
Newswire October 8, 2002. For a complete list of the grants, go to http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/10-2002/10072002.html.
ACHIEVEMENT:
- GAINING GROUND: California charter schools are proving more
effective in improving academic achievement for low income and at-risk
students than their non-charter public school counter-parts according to
a new study from California State University, Los Angeles. See CER's
press release Achievement
Gains Found at California Charter Schools, March 11, 2002, for more
information and a link to the study.
RESOURCES:
Profile of
California Charter School Law
.
Links to California Charter School Websites
.
SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS:
California Network of Educational Charters (CANEC)
1139 San Carlos Ave, #304 San Carlos,
CA
94070
| Contact: Susan Bragato
Tel: 650-654-6003
Fax: 650-654-4267
Email: goCANEC@aol.com | | Website:
http://www.canec.org
| CANEC is a state-wide, nonprofit, non-partisan association of individuals who support charter schools as exciting options for meaningful education reform that allow communities to invent the type of schooling that best meets their unique needs. CANEC is committed to networking charter school participants and facilitating dialogue on these relatively new educational institutions.
|
Charter Schools Project
Institute for Education Reform, California State University, Sacramento 6000 J Street Sacramento,
CA
95819-6018
| Contact: Eric Premack
Tel: 916-278-4611
Fax: 916-278-5014
Email: epremack@aol.com | | Website:
http://www.csus.edu.ier
| The Charter Schools Project provides policy development and technical support to charter school developers, sponsors, and policy makers in California and across the US and Canada. The Project works to link university and state policy makers with important developments and concerns within the K-12 education community and to provide assistance to K-12 schools which are undertaking or contemplating major reform activities.
|
Pacific Research Institute's Center for School
Reform
755 Sansome St.
San Francisco, CA 94111
| Contact: Pam Riley
Telephone: (415) 989-0833, ext. 106
Fax: (415) 989-2411 |
|
|
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION:
Maryland Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
District of Columbia Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Virginia Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Alaska Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Alabama Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Michigan Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Mississippi Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Kansas Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Hawaii Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
California Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Texas Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Missouri Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Arkansas Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Connecticut Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Oregon Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Wisconsin Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
North Dakota Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
South Dakota Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
North Carolina Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
South Carolina Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Florida Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Pennsylvania Charter School Legislation, Laws, Schools & Websites
Charter School Home Page
|